fix(marks): add default signer #207

Merged
enes merged 3 commits from 145-default-signer into 201-toolbox-update 2024-09-19 11:24:17 +00:00
Member

Closes #145

Closes #145
enes added 2 commits 2024-09-17 15:32:07 +00:00
refactor(toolbox): reduce number of mark types
All checks were successful
Open PR on Staging / audit_and_check (pull_request) Successful in 33s
f8a4480994
Closes #201
fix(marks): add default signer
All checks were successful
Open PR on Staging / audit_and_check (pull_request) Successful in 33s
dfdcb8419d
enes changed title from fix(marks): add default signer to WIP: fix(marks): add default signer 2024-09-18 08:48:12 +00:00
eugene reviewed 2024-09-18 09:48:59 +00:00
@ -201,4 +177,2 @@
label: 'Number',
active: false
},
{
Owner

Isn't what the first PR already doing? And similar comment to the first PR - can we rely on the active flag rather than commenting out?

Isn't what the first PR already doing? And similar comment to the first PR - can we rely on the `active` flag rather than commenting out?
Author
Member

I mentioned this one is branched off the 201 so it includes the other PR commit.

I mentioned this one is branched off the 201 so it includes the other PR commit.
Owner

Do you still need the other PR?

Do you still need the other PR?
Author
Member

I'll combine this with the 201 so there's no confusion

I'll combine this with the 201 so there's no confusion
eugene reviewed 2024-09-18 09:49:34 +00:00
@ -536,3 +534,3 @@
if (metadata) {
displayValue = truncate(
metadata.name || metadata.display_name || metadata.username || value,
metadata.display_name || metadata.name || npub,
Owner

Should this be turned into a utilitiy function, something like getDisplayName that can then be re-used wherever needed?

Should this be turned into a utilitiy function, something like `getDisplayName` that can then be re-used wherever needed?
Author
Member

Yes, there are a few places where this shows up, there are also variation with truncate and shorten, I've opened up a new issue to check since I expect more places where it need fixing #205

Yes, there are a few places where this shows up, there are also variation with truncate and shorten, I've opened up a new issue to check since I expect more places where it need fixing https://git.nostrdev.com/sigit/sigit.io/issues/205
Owner

I think it's a fairly minor refactor and can be done as part of the same PR

I think it's a fairly minor refactor and can be done as part of the same PR
Author
Member

Okay, on it!

Okay, on it!
enes added 1 commit 2024-09-19 09:46:48 +00:00
fix: last signer as default next
All checks were successful
Open PR on Staging / audit_and_check (pull_request) Successful in 34s
39934f59c3
enes changed title from WIP: fix(marks): add default signer to fix(marks): add default signer 2024-09-19 09:47:21 +00:00
enes changed target branch from staging to 201-toolbox-update 2024-09-19 11:19:17 +00:00
enes added 1 commit 2024-09-19 11:20:07 +00:00
enes merged commit a1bf88d243 into 201-toolbox-update 2024-09-19 11:24:17 +00:00
enes deleted branch 145-default-signer 2024-09-19 11:24:17 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No reviewers
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: sigit/sigit.io#207
No description provided.